Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1997-03-27 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1997-03-27 House Journal Page 0878 HB 51 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the March26, 1997, calendar (page 860), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 51(RLS) am An Act relating to the Department of Environmental Conservation; amending Rules 79 and 82, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date. The question being: Shall CSHB 51(RLS) am pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 51(RLS) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 23 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Brice, Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Nays: Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Moses, Nicholia Excused: Barnes, Cowdery, Grussendorf, Kubina, Porter, Williams Absent: Hanley, Kelly And so, CSHB 51(RLS) am passed the House. 1997-03-27 House Journal Page 0879 HB 51 Representative Foster moved the effective date clause. The question being: Shall the effective date clause be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 51(RLS) am Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 29 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Brice, Bunde, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kelly, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Nays: Berkowitz, Croft, Kemplen, Moses, Nicholia Excused: Barnes, Cowdery, Grussendorf, Kubina, Porter, Williams And so, the effective date clause was adopted. Representative Foster moved the court rule changes. The question being: Shall the court rule changes be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 51(RLS) am Third Reading Court Rule YEAS: 32 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kelly, Kemplen, Kohring, Kookesh, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Phillips, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Excused: Barnes, Cowdery, Grussendorf, Kubina, Porter, Williams Absent: Davis, Kott 1997-03-27 House Journal Page 0880 HB 51 And so, the court rule changes were adopted. Representative Mulder gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on CSHB 51(RLS) am. Representative Mulder moved and asked unanimous consent that the reconsideration of CSHB 51(RLS) am be taken up on the same day. Representative Elton objected. The question being: Shall the reconsideration of CSHB 51(RLS) am be taken up on the same day? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 51(RLS) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Take up Reconsideration YEAS: 24 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Nays: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Moses, Nicholia Excused: Barnes, Cowdery, Grussendorf, Kubina, Porter, Williams And so, lacking the necessary 27 votes, the reconsideration of CSHB 51(RLS) am was not taken up on the same day.